Current climate Brings you the latest news about the sustainability business every Monday. Sign up to get it in your box.
Byd Electric cars in a trade in Bristol, England.
Getty Images
Tarvalhe Trump Reversal Rapid of Trump administration In the SH.BA clean energy and climate policies are creating headaches for many local producers. The changes are particularly divisive for automobiles that have passed in previous years – and billions of dollars – to develop cheaper, better electric vehicles.
Finishing federal tax loans to EV buyers up to $ 7,500 and interrupting federal support, things Trump has accumulated in the Green New Scam category will not kill US sales, but is expected to slow them this year. Meanwhile, in China, the largest market in the world EV, things continue to get hot.
Chinese home giants, including EV and Battery Battery Byd, tend to expand globally. In fact, Byd just collected $ 5.6 billion to do exactly that. The company wants to raise sales from foreign markets in half of its total revenue, from 30% in the first half of 2024. Given the cost advantage of our and European manufacturers, including Tesla, this is probably achievable.
Meanwhile, the extent to which China’s impetus to turn its vehicle industry into EVS also allows newcomers to bloom. Nowhere is this more clear than Xiaomi, a manufacturer of smartphones and consumer electronics, capitalized in China’s EV production infrastructure, including cheaper batteries, electronics, processed materials and work, to sell an extraordinary unit of 135,000 in the first year. As the New York Times pointed out, Apple spent $ 10 billion and about a decade to develop an electric car that eventually decided not to do.
The Trump administration may not take care of EV, but more and more the world does. And China is just too happy to dominate that market.
Great reading
gettin
This startup has a way to make hydrogen free, clean – without federal subsidies
Pure hydrogen has the potential to strengthen a number of industrial activities. Interest in its production increased under President Joe Biden, whose administration set billions of dollars in federal subsidies to help companies do it from things like water and renewable energy. Some of those projects are in danger as the Trump administration changes the course on clean energy and climate policy, but the Bay Area-Startup Energy says there is a method of generating hydrogen that is not only affordable and clean-it at the same time produces a valuable graphite. Best of all, there is no need for federal funds.
Graphitic, who has collected $ 65 million from supporters including Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Energy Capital Ventures and Trafigura, extracts hydrogen and carbon molecules from natural gas with a method that uses a relatively small amount of electricity, CEO and associates Zaach Jones said i said i said i said i said i said i said i said i said i said i said stale. Instead of releasing warm carbon from the climate, which occurs with traditional hydrogen production, or pumping it underground, which some large energy companies are making, Graphitic turns it into a graphite that aims to sell industrial customers. The mineral, which can sell a metric ton for more than $ 2,500, and is mainly produced in China now.
To prove its technique, the company is opening a pilot factory this week at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, she says she can make 400 pounds of hydrogen a day and 1,000 pounds of synthetic graphite. The plant was built without the help of the government. With regard to traditional forms of industrial hydrogen production, the graph evaluates its process reduces CO2 pollution by 90%. If everything goes well, it plans to open its first large -scale facility in 2027.
“In places where we think there are markets for [hydrogen] You may not have access to renewable electricity, “he said.” So you really need to understand how to empower everyone with natural gas. “
Read more here
Hot
Tom Ellison
Center for Climate and Safety
Tom Ellison, Deputy Director of the Climate and Security Center in the Pentagon change in climate policies
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth showed Plans to eliminate department programs regarding climate change. Why is this something in which it is focused?
The Department of Defense is, among many other things, a truly great logistical organization that many people and places need to manage from point A to point B. They have interested in it for a long time. Much of the early work on this came out of the broader environmental safety conversation within the pentagon about how the training was developed, while also respecting the rules of environmental protection, such things.
Also around the beginning of the mid -2000s, you have had studies by people with the Center for Maritime Analysis and senior military officials, where they spoke of that multiplier concept of threat. So it has really been very sustainable over time in the military community for those kind of practical reasons.
The beginnings of this would have been in the Clinton administration, but the most specific climate focus has come in the last 20 years.
What are the potential risks to the military by ignoring climate change?
There is a portion of physical viability. For example, with aircraft it has an effect on the holding capacity. The stamps melt in heat. Climate change affects air activity.
There is also part of the forecast and planning, both planning and purchasing infrastructure and long -lived equipment. And there is only the idea that many of these climate risks and weakness – water insecurity, food insecurity, price points, natural resource competitions – all of these things can eventually contribute or lead to conflict. This certainly affects the army.
The army is also not only in the US, but operates all over the world as a type of first response as disaster default. So if you are not prepared enough, even if you are not willing or unable to meet that increased request, there are serious implications for your citizen, for your other missions, all these other things.
What else are we reading
The US State Department closes the monitoring of pollution abroad. Since 2008, embassies and other diplomatic posts have published data on local air quality. In many places, it was the only reliable source of such information. (New York Times))
Cutting it down in size. Many artificial intelligence models are hungry and expensive. Researchers in the Global South are increasingly embracing low -cost, low -power alternatives (Science))
The increasing threat of catastrophic flood in rural America. Climate change is driving more intense and frequent extreme rainfall events, increasing the possibility of catastrophic floods throughout the US (Institute of Pacific))
Attempts to plant trees in neighborhoods that need bad will be turned With the US Forest Service decision to terminate a $ 75 million grant for the Arbor Day Foundation. Another is another victim of President Donald Trump’s push to overthrow environmental justice initiatives. (Associate press))
Trump administration plans to remove a federal lawsuit Against a synthetic rubber manufacturer charged with deteriorating the risks of cancer for residents in a black -majority community in Luiziana. The mass will undo one of the highest profile objectives of former President Joe Biden to improve conditions in countries damaged by industrial pollution. (Associate press))
Renewable renovations will beat fossil fuels over time despite Trump’s efforts. Fossil fuels are much more expensive than renewable resources when considering health and environmental costs – a major reason to keep the risk of endangering intact. (stale))
More by Forbes